From c6af8adc44bf6b53ac3b875fe1f644c05a990d2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:23:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] 00341: bpo-39460: Fix test_zipfile.test_add_file_after_2107()

XFS filesystem is limited to 32-bit timestamp, but the utimensat()
syscall doesn't fail. Moreover, there is a VFS bug which returns
a cached timestamp which is different than the value on disk.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795576
https://bugs.python.org/issue39460#msg360952
---
 Lib/test/test_zipfile.py | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Lib/test/test_zipfile.py b/Lib/test/test_zipfile.py
index f03c044eae..0737c343cb 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_zipfile.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_zipfile.py
@@ -602,6 +602,18 @@ class StoredTestsWithSourceFile(AbstractTestsWithSourceFile,
         except OverflowError:
             self.skipTest('Host fs cannot set timestamp to required value.')
 
+        mtime_ns = os.stat(TESTFN).st_mtime_ns
+        if mtime_ns != (4386268800 * 10**9):
+            # XFS filesystem is limited to 32-bit timestamp, but the syscall
+            # didn't fail. Moreover, there is a VFS bug which returns
+            # a cached timestamp which is different than the value on disk.
+            #
+            # Test st_mtime_ns rather than st_mtime to avoid rounding issues.
+            #
+            # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795576
+            # https://bugs.python.org/issue39460#msg360952
+            self.skipTest(f"Linux VFS/XFS kernel bug detected: {mtime_ns=}")
+
         with zipfile.ZipFile(TESTFN2, "w") as zipfp:
             self.assertRaises(struct.error, zipfp.write, TESTFN)
 
-- 
2.24.1