From 6e14981d8b6ba0d4f70de9b1a7de90146d35f395 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miro Hrončok <miro@hroncok.cz>
Date: Nov 25 2019 12:20:27 +0000
Subject: Add "downstream only" explanations to various patches


Suggested by Neal Gompa in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774417

---

diff --git a/python3.spec b/python3.spec
index 9fa969e..b920ffb 100644
--- a/python3.spec
+++ b/python3.spec
@@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ Patch111: 00111-no-static-lib.patch
 # 00189 #
 # Instead of bundled wheels, use our RPM packaged wheels from
 # /usr/share/python-wheels
+# Downstream only: upstream bundles
+# We might eventually pursuit upstream support, but it's low prio
 Patch189: 00189-use-rpm-wheels.patch
 
 # 00251
@@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ Patch189: 00189-use-rpm-wheels.patch
 # to /usr/local if executable is /usr/bin/python* and RPM build
 # is not detected to make pip and distutils install into separate location
 # Fedora Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe
+# Downstream only: Awaiting resources to work on upstream PEP
 Patch251: 00251-change-user-install-location.patch
 
 # 00274 #
@@ -262,6 +265,8 @@ Patch274: 00274-fix-arch-names.patch
 # 00328 #
 # Restore pyc to TIMESTAMP invalidation mode as default in rpmbubild
 # See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/57#comment-27426
+# Downstream only: only used when building RPM packages
+# Ideally, we should talk to upstream and explain why we don't want this
 Patch328: 00328-pyc-timestamp-invalidation-mode.patch
 
 # (New patches go here ^^^)