#14 Obsolete gnome-books
Merged 2 years ago by kalev. Opened 2 years ago by hadess.
Unknown source master  into  master

file modified
+13 -1
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@

  Name:       fedora-obsolete-packages

  # Please keep the version equal to the targeted Fedora release

  Version:    30

- Release:    25

+ Release:    26

  Summary:    A package to obsolete retired packages

  

  # This package has no actual content; there is nothing to license.
@@ -162,6 +162,12 @@

  Obsoletes: vala-compat-doc < 0.18.1-13

  Obsoletes: vala-compat-tools < 0.18.1-13

  

+ # Remove in F33

+ # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678652

+ # We obsolete 3.31.x so that the 3.30 branch can be updated

+ # and still obsoleted

+ Obsoletes: gnome-books <= 3.31.0

+ 

  # ==========================================

  # Please collect the python2 Obsoletes: here

  # ==========================================
@@ -692,6 +698,9 @@

    vte3-devel < 0.38

    (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315425)

  

+   gnome-books <= 3.30.1

+   (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678652)

+ 

  Plus the following python2 packages, in accordance with the general switch away

  from Python2 ahead of its retirement in 2020.  See

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FinalizingFedoraSwitchtoPython3 for more
@@ -1157,6 +1166,9 @@

  

  

  %changelog

+ * Tue Feb 19 2019 Bastien Nocera <bnocera@redhat.com> - 30-26

+ - Obsolete gnome-books after split off from gnome-documents

+ 

  * Wed Feb 13 2019 Björn Esser <besser82@fedoraproject.org> - 30-25

  - Obsolete trafficserver < 5.3.0-14 and its sub-packages

  

gnome-books was split off from gnome-documents during the development cycle that corresponds to Fedora 30's development cycle (GNOME's 3.31.x versions). As gnome-books isn't packaged as an independent package, it should be obsoleted so that gnome-documents can be updated on its own.

Feel free to squash the changes if you feel that the spec admin can be merged in with the actual changes.

Sorry, needs some changes on my side, I misread the "remove in..." labels.

rebased onto add23a8

2 years ago

Sorry, needs some changes on my side, I misread the "remove in..." labels.

Fixed now.

Pull-Request has been merged by kalev

2 years ago