PR#2: Upstream rebase, early June 2023 - rpms/harec

rpms / harec

#2 Upstream rebase, early June 2023

Merged 11 months ago by fed500. Opened 11 months ago by fnux.

rpms/ fnux/harec rawhide into rawhide

Upstream rebase, early June 2023

Timothée Floure • 11 months ago

1536956

.gitignore

file modified

		`@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@`
		`/a1aa5039.tar.gz`
		`/dd50ca77.tar.gz`
		`+ /174aef48.tar.gz`

harec.spec

file modified

+5 -3

		`@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@`
		`- %global commit dd50ca7740408e3c6e41c0ca48b59b9f7f5911f2`
		`+ %global commit 174aef484c0b0067f0a131dc52ee05af1a0e5027`
		`%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:8})`
		`- %global date 20230316`
		`+ %global date 20230610`

		`Summary: Hare bootstrap compiler`
		`Name: harec`
		`@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@`
		`%{_bindir}/harec`

		`%changelog`
		`+ * Sat Jun 10 2023 Timothée Floure <fnux@fedoraproject.org> - 0^20230610git174aef48-1`
		`+ - Upstream rebase, early June 2023`
		`+`
		`* Sat Apr 15 2023 Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi@fedoraproject.org> - 0^20230316gitdd50ca77-1`
		`- Updated to March 2023`

		`@@ -67,4 +70,3 @@`

		`* Fri Dec 16 2022 Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org> - 0^20221126gita1aa5039-1`
		`- Initial packaging`
		`-`

sources

file modified

+1 -1

		`@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@`
		`- SHA512 (dd50ca77.tar.gz) = d776b399f6d29442ede6d1ce2c56f239c6f6eab7f4d641e1b5b0b4ddb363c55518a50748103ae87181a12587d2f1cc4dc57fc278339fafdf04bfeb786517f648`
		`+ SHA512 (174aef48.tar.gz) = 9f353adf6b7143d498d79d7f0b4fcb9f7286b5df117d19c319aca32e496b2cd73ae5b9d814f8f744a0852135aecb3045e286e0886c9759e8dfa7f04c380f15dd`

fnux commented 11 months ago

Just a quick upstream-rebase :-) Could you add me as co-maintainer? It'll convenient once hare lands in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514

fed500 commented 11 months ago

Thanks. Maybe it is helpful to setup a SIG? This would allow keeping related Hare packages together.

Pull-Request has been merged by fed500

11 months ago

fnux commented 11 months ago

A SIG with its own group and permissions could make sense in the future, but I'd say it's too early. It's quite a bit of work to set it up, and it doesn't bring that much for two packages.

I'd rather first see how the Hare ecosystem evolves, and only consider a SIG when there is a significant amount of packages making use of hare.

fnux commented 11 months ago

And thanks for the merge! :-)