PR#45: Change PFSL to Python because rpmspec uses Python abbreviation - rpms/linux-system-roles

Sergei Petrosian • 2 years ago

67dbba9

linux-system-roles.spec

file modified

+6 -2

		`@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@`
		`Url: https://github.com/linux-system-roles`
		`Summary: Set of interfaces for unified system management`
		`Version: 1.9.0`
		`- Release: 2%{?dist}`
		`+ Release: 3%{?dist}`

		`#Group: Development/Libraries`
		`- License: GPLv3+ and MIT and BSD and PSFL`
		`+ License: GPLv3+ and MIT and BSD and Python`
		`%global installbase %{_datadir}/linux-system-roles`
		`%global _pkglicensedir %{_licensedir}/%{name}`
		`%global rolealtprefix linux-system-roles.`
		`@@ -706,6 +706,10 @@`
		`%endif`

		`%changelog`
		`+ * Tue Oct 26 2021 Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi@redhat.com> - 1.9.0-3`
		`+ - Change the PFSL license to Python because this is how PFSL is reffered to in`
		`+ rpminspect-data packages in Fedora, CentOS, and RHEL`
		`+`
		`* Tue Oct 19 2021 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> - 1.9.0-2`
		`- customize galaxy.yml for Red Hat`
		`Resolves rhbz#2011808 (EL8)`

no initial comment

Thank you for fixing the rpmspec failure, @spetros.

PSFL is indeed for the "vendored" module mount.py for storage.

It is licensed under the PYTHON SOFTWARE FOUNDATION LICENSE VERSION 2

lgtm, too.

This is a feature of the rpmspec and how it refers to licenses. PFSL is referred to as Python for some reason, the Python entry in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing corresponds to PFS license.