From bc0f275b1e07941b97bc193f7f0b8d57982832c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Date: Jul 18 2018 10:28:45 +0000
Subject: move ownership of /usr/share/lua/5.3 and /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 to lua-libs


As far as I can tell there should not be any effect visible outside of
RPM database and fedora-review tool.

This change is needed to make lua-libs package + *other* Lua packages
compliant with packaging guidelines.

Formerly the lua-libs package put a library /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 directory
but did not own the directory itself. This is being flagged by
fedora-review as non-compliance.

This problem affected other Lua packages which put library into
/usr/lib64/lua/5.3 as well. These other libraries were always flagged
by fedora-review as non-compliant because the library package did not
Require a package which owns /usr/lib64/lua/5.3.
(The build system autogenerates depedency on lua-libs which did not own
the directory.)

---

diff --git a/lua.spec b/lua.spec
index fd12da5..2dc7cfa 100644
--- a/lua.spec
+++ b/lua.spec
@@ -188,20 +188,19 @@ install -Dpm 0644 %{SOURCE1000} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{macrosdir}/macros.lua
 %doc README doc/*.html doc/*.css doc/*.gif doc/*.png
 %{_bindir}/lua
 %{_bindir}/luac
-%if 0%{?bootstrap}
-%dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
-%dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
-%endif
 %{_mandir}/man1/lua*.1*
+
+%files libs
 %dir %{_libdir}/lua
 %dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{major_version}
+%{_libdir}/liblua-%{major_version}.so
 %dir %{_datadir}/lua
 %dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{major_version}
 
-%files libs
-%{_libdir}/liblua-%{major_version}.so
 %if 0%{?bootstrap}
+%dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
 %{_libdir}/liblua-%{bootstrap_major_version}.so
+%dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
 %endif
 
 %files devel