PR#10: F32: The ultimate Python 2 release. Long live Python 3 - rpms/python27

rpms / python27

#10 F32: The ultimate Python 2 release. Long live Python 3

Merged 4 years ago by churchyard. Opened 4 years ago by churchyard.

rpms/ churchyard/python27 f32-ultimate_release into f32

The ultimate Python 2 release. Long live Python 3

Miro Hrončok • 4 years ago

9d7676a

Update to 2.7.18rc1

Marcel Plch • 4 years ago

d76f249

pubkeys.txt

file added

+11542

The added file is too large to be shown here, see it at: pubkeys.txt

python27.spec

file modified

+16 -5

		`@@ -51,11 +51,13 @@`
		`# ==================`
		`Summary: Version %{pybasever} of the Python interpreter`
		`Name: python%{pyshortver}`
		`- %global general_version %{pybasever}.17`
		`+ URL: https://www.python.org/`
		`+`
		`+ %global general_version %{pybasever}.18`
		`#global prerel ...`
		`%global upstream_version %{general_version}%{?prerel}`
		`Version: %{general_version}%{?prerel:~%{prerel}}`
		`- Release: 2%{?dist}`
		`+ Release: 1%{?dist}`
		`License: Python`

		`# Python 2 is deprecated in Fedora 30+, see:`
		`@@ -113,6 +115,7 @@`
		`BuildRequires: tix-devel`
		`BuildRequires: tk-devel`
		`BuildRequires: zlib-devel`
		`+ BuildRequires: gnupg2`

		`%if %{with_gdbm}`
		`# ABI change without soname bump, reverted`
		`@@ -172,7 +175,9 @@`
		`# Source code and patches`
		`# =======================`

		`- Source: https://www.python.org/ftp/python/%{general_version}/Python-%{upstream_version}.tar.xz`
		`+ Source0: %{url}ftp/python/%{general_version}/Python-%{upstream_version}.tar.xz`
		`+ Source1: %{url}ftp/python/%{general_version}/Python-%{upstream_version}.tar.xz.asc`
		`+ Source2: %{url}static/files/pubkeys.txt`

		`# Systemtap tapset to make it easier to use the systemtap static probes`
		`# (actually a template; LIBRARY_PATH will get fixed up during install)`
		`@@ -681,8 +686,6 @@`
		`# Additional metadata`
		`# ======================================================`

		`- URL: https://www.python.org/`
		`-`
		`%description`
		`Python 2 is an old version of the language that is incompatible with the 3.x`
		`line of releases. The language is mostly the same, but many details, especially`
		`@@ -700,6 +703,7 @@`
		`# ======================================================`

		`%prep`
		`+ %gpgverify -k2 -s1 -d0`
		`%setup -q -n Python-%{upstream_version}`

		`%if 0%{?with_systemtap}`
		`@@ -1489,6 +1493,13 @@`
		`# ======================================================`

		`%changelog`
		`+ * Mon Apr 20 2020 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> - 2.7.18-1`
		`+ - Update to 2.7.18`
		`+ - This is is the last Python 2.7 release and therefore the last Python 2 release`
		`+`
		`+ * Thu Apr 09 2020 Marcel Plch <mplch@redhat.com> - 2.7.18~rc1-1`
		`+ - Update to 2.7.18rc1`
		`+`
		`* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@fedoraproject.org> - 2.7.17-2`
		`- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild`

sources

file modified

+2 -1

		`@@ -1,1 +1,2 @@`
		`- SHA512 (Python-2.7.17.tar.xz) = 2dc19a0b0d818c71429dae94783e58b2aac0fa31f5faa1e840cac06245a59932ecc4658d913515736601bcf70a78c9ec60367aed75f4567d1e41ff3bb104da9a`
		`+ SHA512 (Python-2.7.18.tar.xz) = a7bb62b51f48ff0b6df0b18f5b0312a523e3110f49c3237936bfe56ed0e26838c0274ff5401bda6fc21bf24337477ccac49e8026c5d651e4b4cafb5eb5086f6c`
		`+ SHA512 (Python-2.7.18.tar.xz.asc) = c2a5f5a52f47dec52460ad3275758d4e5de6e7075c3def4353c988d74d563a39b42cae2d5eb24e2a23a6247cef69100f91620b11a49c2359fbf99b203c9cbda8`

no initial comment

zuul commented 4 years ago

Build failed.

rpm-linter : FAILURE in 2m 44s (non-voting)
rpm-scratch-build : SUCCESS in 26m 10s
rpm-rpminspect : SUCCESS in 4m 17s (non-voting)
check-for-tests : SUCCESS in 5s
rpm-test : FAILURE in 4m 01s

churchyard commented 4 years ago

@fbo the zuul job was run on rawhide, according to https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0073c12a40f4458aaa919f4f286bd118/log/artifacts/installed-packages.list

churchyard commented 4 years ago

and the Fedora CI hasn't even started. [citest]

churchyard commented 4 years ago

recheck

churchyard commented 4 years ago

[citest]

zuul commented 4 years ago

Build failed.

rpm-linter : FAILURE in 3m 30s (non-voting)
rpm-scratch-build : SUCCESS in 20m 46s
rpm-rpminspect : SUCCESS in 5m 20s (non-voting)
check-for-tests : SUCCESS in 9s
rpm-test : FAILURE in 4m 42s

churchyard commented 4 years ago

[citest]

lbalhar commented 4 years ago

The diff and the build log look good. RPM is installable and works as usual.

churchyard commented 4 years ago

Thank you @lbalhar

Pull-Request has been merged by churchyard

4 years ago

fbo commented 4 years ago

@fbo the zuul job was run on rawhide, according to https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0073c12a40f4458aaa919f4f286bd118/log/artifacts/installed-packages.list

Yes, we don't have yet the image f32 on softwarefactory-project.io (https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/local/labels). I'll manage to enable it (we are close to the release, so I guess that's fine). The definition of the job still use rawhide yes: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs/blob/master/f/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#_32

churchyard commented 4 years ago

Glad to hear it is known.

we are close to the release, so I guess that's fine

That part is what I don't understand. How is this related to the release? The tests being run on f32 is beneficial the very moment rawhide and f32 diverge -- that is almost immediately after branching. See also https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/97

fbo commented 4 years ago

Glad to hear it is known.

we are close to the release, so I guess that's fine

That part is what I don't understand. How is this related to the release? The tests being run on f32 is beneficial the very moment rawhide and f32 diverge -- that is almost immediately after branching. See also https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/97

Well, you are right. It was a bad statement. So yes as long as we have a working cloud image for the next release stable release we can expose it in Nodepool and make it available for Zuul jobs to run on.

fbo commented 4 years ago

@churchyard : The cloud-fedora-32 image is now ready. I merged that patch 1 to add the new nodeset and set rpm-test job for f32 branch to use that new nodeset. I've validated the change with this PR 2

Let me know if you see any issue.

churchyard commented 4 years ago

Thanks. Will do.