From: Jan Beulich Subject: gnttab: don't use possibly unbounded tail calls There is no guarantee that the compiler would actually translate them to branches instead of calls, so only ones with a known recursion limit are okay: - __release_grant_for_copy() can call itself only once, as __acquire_grant_for_copy() won't permit use of multi-level transitive grants, - __acquire_grant_for_copy() is fine to call itself with the last argument false, as that prevents further recursion, - __acquire_grant_for_copy() must not call itself to recover from an observed change to the active entry's pin count This is part of CVE-2017-12135 / XSA-226. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/common/compat/grant_table.c +++ b/xen/common/compat/grant_table.c @@ -258,9 +258,9 @@ int compat_grant_table_op(unsigned int cmd, rc = gnttab_copy(guest_handle_cast(nat.uop, gnttab_copy_t), n); if ( rc > 0 ) { - ASSERT(rc < n); - i -= n - rc; - n = rc; + ASSERT(rc <= n); + i -= rc; + n -= rc; } if ( rc >= 0 ) { --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c @@ -2103,8 +2103,10 @@ __release_grant_for_copy( if ( td != rd ) { - /* Recursive calls, but they're tail calls, so it's - okay. */ + /* + * Recursive calls, but they're bounded (acquire permits only a single + * level of transitivity), so it's okay. + */ if ( released_write ) __release_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, 0); else if ( released_read ) @@ -2255,10 +2257,11 @@ __acquire_grant_for_copy( return rc; } - /* We dropped the lock, so we have to check that nobody - else tried to pin (or, for that matter, unpin) the - reference in *this* domain. If they did, just give up - and try again. */ + /* + * We dropped the lock, so we have to check that nobody else tried + * to pin (or, for that matter, unpin) the reference in *this* + * domain. If they did, just give up and tell the caller to retry. + */ if ( act->pin != old_pin ) { __fixup_status_for_copy_pin(act, status); @@ -2266,9 +2269,8 @@ __acquire_grant_for_copy( active_entry_release(act); grant_read_unlock(rgt); put_page(*page); - return __acquire_grant_for_copy(rd, gref, ldom, readonly, - frame, page, page_off, length, - allow_transitive); + *page = NULL; + return ERESTART; } /* The actual remote remote grant may or may not be a @@ -2574,7 +2576,7 @@ static int gnttab_copy_one(const struct { gnttab_copy_release_buf(src); rc = gnttab_copy_claim_buf(op, &op->source, src, GNTCOPY_source_gref); - if ( rc < 0 ) + if ( rc ) goto out; } @@ -2584,7 +2586,7 @@ static int gnttab_copy_one(const struct { gnttab_copy_release_buf(dest); rc = gnttab_copy_claim_buf(op, &op->dest, dest, GNTCOPY_dest_gref); - if ( rc < 0 ) + if ( rc ) goto out; } @@ -2593,6 +2595,14 @@ static int gnttab_copy_one(const struct return rc; } +/* + * gnttab_copy(), other than the various other helpers of + * do_grant_table_op(), returns (besides possible error indicators) + * "count - i" rather than "i" to ensure that even if no progress + * was made at all (perhaps due to gnttab_copy_one() returning a + * positive value) a non-zero value is being handed back (zero needs + * to be avoided, as that means "success, all done"). + */ static long gnttab_copy( XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(gnttab_copy_t) uop, unsigned int count) { @@ -2606,7 +2616,7 @@ static long gnttab_copy( { if ( i && hypercall_preempt_check() ) { - rc = i; + rc = count - i; break; } @@ -2616,13 +2626,20 @@ static long gnttab_copy( break; } - op.status = gnttab_copy_one(&op, &dest, &src); - if ( op.status != GNTST_okay ) + rc = gnttab_copy_one(&op, &dest, &src); + if ( rc > 0 ) + { + rc = count - i; + break; + } + if ( rc != GNTST_okay ) { gnttab_copy_release_buf(&src); gnttab_copy_release_buf(&dest); } + op.status = rc; + rc = 0; if ( unlikely(__copy_field_to_guest(uop, &op, status)) ) { rc = -EFAULT; @@ -3160,6 +3177,7 @@ do_grant_table_op( rc = gnttab_copy(copy, count); if ( rc > 0 ) { + rc = count - rc; guest_handle_add_offset(copy, rc); uop = guest_handle_cast(copy, void); }