From 2ad01780bf59b3a785975bf48a066645e5b6f7f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:06:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm
 limitations (v2)

If we can't find any valid level 0 watermark values for the requested
atomic transaction, reject the configuration before we try to start
programming the hardware.

v2:
 - Add extra debugging output when we reject level 0 watermarks so that
   we can more easily debug how/why they were rejected.

Cc: Lyude Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463061971-19638-17-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index b072417..f764d28 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3306,7 +3306,22 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 
 	if (res_blocks >= ddb_allocation || res_lines > 31) {
 		*enabled = false;
-		return 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * If there are no valid level 0 watermarks, then we can't
+		 * support this display configuration.
+		 */
+		if (level) {
+			return 0;
+		} else {
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Plane %d.%d: blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
+				      to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc)->pipe,
+				      skl_wm_plane_id(to_intel_plane(pstate->plane)),
+				      res_blocks, ddb_allocation, res_lines);
+
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 
 	*out_blocks = res_blocks;
-- 
2.7.4