|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
The licensing for this module is interesting -- the documentation of the
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
module states that the license is Perl (aka GPL or Artistic), whereas the
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
files have LGPL headers and the tarball includes the text of the LGPL itself.
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Given the author's response, my assessment is that this software is triple
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
licensed: It may be used under the terms of the GPL, LGPL, or Artistic
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
license, at your option.
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
From: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@jabber.org>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
To: Chris Weyl <cweyl@alumni.drew.edu>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Date: May 22, 2006 6:03 PM
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Whatever. I don't actually care one way or the other. Go right ahead.
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Chris Weyl wrote:
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> Sorry to keep on bugging you, but would it be OK for me to strip out
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> the LGPL licensing statements?
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> Or is this software triple licensed? e.g. Perl (GPL or Artistic), LGPL?
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> Thanks :)
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> -Chris
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
> On 5/15/06, Chris Weyl <cweyl@alumni.drew.edu> wrote:
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> If this code isn't meant to also be licensed under the LGPL, would it
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> be ok with you for me to patch the LGPL statements out for the version
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> released under fedora extras?
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> -Chris
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> On 5/14/06, Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@jabber.org> wrote:
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > Yep.
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > Chris Weyl wrote:
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > Hey Ryan--
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > LICENSE.LGPL.
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"?
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > Thanks:)
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > > -Chris
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > --
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > Ryan Eatmon
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> > reatmon@jabber.org
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> >
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> --
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> Chris Weyl
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>> Ex astris, scientia
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
>
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
--
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
Ryan Eatmon
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
reatmon@jabber.org
|
|
Chris Weyl |
f466821 |
|