The licensing for this module is interesting -- the documentation of the
module states that the license is Perl (aka GPL or Artistic), whereas the
files have LGPL headers and the tarball includes the text of the LGPL itself.

Given the author's response, my assessment is that this software is triple
licensed:  It may be used under the terms of the GPL, LGPL, or Artistic
license, at your option.

From: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@jabber.org>  
To: Chris Weyl <cweyl@alumni.drew.edu>
Date: May 22, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question

Whatever.  I don't actually care one way or the other.  Go right ahead.

Chris Weyl wrote:
> Sorry to keep on bugging you, but would it be OK for me to strip out
> the LGPL licensing statements?
>
> Or is this software triple licensed?  e.g. Perl (GPL or Artistic), LGPL?
>
> Thanks :)
>                                -Chris
>
> On 5/15/06, Chris Weyl <cweyl@alumni.drew.edu> wrote:
>> If this code isn't meant to also be licensed under the LGPL, would it
>> be ok with you for me to patch the LGPL statements out for the version
>> released under fedora extras?
>>
>>                            -Chris
>>
>> On 5/14/06, Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@jabber.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yep.
>> >
>> >
>> > Chris Weyl wrote:
>> > > Hey Ryan--
>> > >
>> > > Quick question.  I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for
>> > > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it
>> > > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This
>> > > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> > > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a
>> > > LICENSE.LGPL.
>> > >
>> > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks:)
>> > >                               -Chris
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ryan Eatmon
>> > reatmon@jabber.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Weyl
>> Ex astris, scientia
>>
>
>


--
Ryan Eatmon
reatmon@jabber.org