From 6b62bbbc7b53bee11778d27d18e9506d9b42d4ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:29:48 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 044/261] logind: some firmware implementations remove
 OsIndications if it is unset

We shouldn't fall over that, and just assume it is 0 in this case.

Fixes #499.
---
 src/shared/efivars.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/shared/efivars.c b/src/shared/efivars.c
index 0d6ecf5..347cd30 100644
--- a/src/shared/efivars.c
+++ b/src/shared/efivars.c
@@ -125,7 +125,19 @@ static int get_os_indications(uint64_t *os_indication) {
                 return r;
 
         r = efi_get_variable(EFI_VENDOR_GLOBAL, "OsIndications", NULL, &v, &s);
-        if (r < 0)
+        if (r == -ENOENT) {
+                /* Some firmware implementations that do support
+                 * OsIndications and report that with
+                 * OsIndicationsSupported will remove the
+                 * OsIndications variable when it is unset. Let's
+                 * pretend it's 0 then, to hide this implementation
+                 * detail. Note that this call will return -ENOENT
+                 * then only if the support for OsIndications is
+                 * missing entirely, as determined by
+                 * efi_reboot_to_firmware_supported() above. */
+                *os_indication = 0;
+                return 0;
+        } else if (r < 0)
                 return r;
         else if (s != sizeof(uint64_t))
                 return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.4.3