Blob Blame History Raw
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Delivered-To: jonstanley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.37.136 with SMTP id x8cs140695ibd;
        Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.121.14 with SMTP id t14mr5736578anc.129.1249614440016; 
	Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9de9792e0908061943y6c05633cw2fc38079470d8232@mail.gmail.com>
References: <da159fda0908061906v35b0aci6cf4f559f78d3b8d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9de9792e0908061943y6c05633cw2fc38079470d8232@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:07:19 +0800
Message-ID: <9de9792e0908062007v287219dbkceb49f65b85515d5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trac ticket template plugin - licensing question
From: Richard Liao <richard.liao.i@gmail.com>
To: Jon Stanley <jonstanley@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/8/7 Richard Liao <richard.liao.i@gmail.com>:
> The license is LGPLv2.1. I have updated license line in setup.py
> See also: http://trac-hacks.org/changeset/6330
>
Studied LGPLv2.1, I think BSD license should be more applicable to this plu=
gin.
See also: http://trac-hacks.org/changeset/6332

> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jon Stanley<jonstanley@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In setup.py, you mention that the license is BSD, yet there is a
>> license.txt which gives the text of LGPLv2.  No source files have a
>> notice stating which license they are under (which they should,
>> independently of any confusion).  Which one is accurate and which
>> license is this plugin released under?  And what version(s) of LGPL if
>> that indeed is the license (simply including the text of a license
>> with no further explanation is legally ineffective and in the case of
>> the GPL family of licenses, does not restrict us to that version).  If
>> that's what you intended, it needs to be explicitly stated.
>>
>> The context of the questions is that I'm attempting to package this
>> for inclusion into Fedora.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Jon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> '''=B9=FD=B3=CC=B8=C4=BD=F8=C4=CB=CA=C7=B4=DF=C9=FA=BF=C9=B4=D9=C9=FA=BF=
=BF=C6=D7=B5=C4=C8=CB=B5=C4=D7=E9=D6=AF!'''
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> =C8=ED=BC=FE=CA=C2=D2=B5=B2=BF - =D1=D0=B7=A2=B9=DC=C0=ED=D6=D0=D0=C4 - S=
PEG http://trac.rdev.kingsoft.net/kspeg
> Mr. Richard - =C1=CE=BD=DC <LiaoJie AT kingsoft.com> 13750037331
> =D3=CA=B1=E0: 519015            ; =B5=D8=D6=B7: =D6=E9=BA=A3=CA=D0=BC=AA=
=B4=F3=C1=AB=C9=BD=CF=EF8=BA=C5=BD=F0=C9=BD=C8=ED=BC=FE=B4=F3=CF=C3 F12
> =B5=E7=BB=B0: 0756-3335688-2756 ; =B4=AB=D5=E6: 0756-3335268
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>



--=20
'''=B9=FD=B3=CC=B8=C4=BD=F8=C4=CB=CA=C7=B4=DF=C9=FA=BF=C9=B4=D9=C9=FA=BF=BF=
=C6=D7=B5=C4=C8=CB=B5=C4=D7=E9=D6=AF!'''
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=C8=ED=BC=FE=CA=C2=D2=B5=B2=BF - =D1=D0=B7=A2=B9=DC=C0=ED=D6=D0=D0=C4 - SPE=
G http://trac.rdev.kingsoft.net/kspeg
Mr. Richard - =C1=CE=BD=DC <LiaoJie AT kingsoft.com> 13750037331
=D3=CA=B1=E0: 519015            ; =B5=D8=D6=B7: =D6=E9=BA=A3=CA=D0=BC=AA=B4=
=F3=C1=AB=C9=BD=CF=EF8=BA=C5=BD=F0=C9=BD=C8=ED=BC=FE=B4=F3=CF=C3 F12
=B5=E7=BB=B0: 0756-3335688-2756 ; =B4=AB=D5=E6: 0756-3335268
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~